☁️ AI Weather Report — Top 10 Models for Coding Value — October 03, 2026

Welcome to the AI Weather Report for October 03, 2026. This daily report ranks the top 10 AI models for coding by bang for the buck — a combination of raw coding capability and API pricing.

📊 Today’s Top 10 Rankings

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokensValue Score
🥇 1 mistral-nemo mistralai 62/100 $0.0272 2275.2
🥈 2 deepseek-v4-flash deepseek 91/100 $0.0490 1857.1
🥉 3 l3-lunaris-8b sao10k 58/100 $0.0475 1221.1
4 gpt-oss-20b openai 78/100 $0.0720 1083.3
5 mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501 mistralai 72/100 $0.0725 993.1
6 llama-3.1-8b-instruct meta-llama 62/100 $0.0725 855.2
7 laguna-xs-2.1 poolside 72/100 $0.1050 685.7
8 gpt-oss-120b openai 93/100 $0.1368 680.1
9 gemma-3-4b-it google 50/100 $0.0875 571.4
10 qwen3.5-9b qwen 72/100 $0.1375 523.6

📈 Analysis

🏆 Best Value Today: mistral-nemo scores 2275.2 with a capability rating of 62 at $0.0272/M tokens.

What “Value Score” means: Capability score (based on SWE-bench, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench) divided by blended cost per million tokens (25% input + 75% output weights for coding workloads). Free tier models get a massive boost. Higher is better.

📋 All Scored Models (60 total)

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokValue
1mistral-nemomistralai62$0.02722275.2
2deepseek-v4-flashdeepseek91$0.04901857.1
3l3-lunaris-8bsao10k58$0.04751221.1
4gpt-oss-20bopenai78$0.07201083.3
5mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501mistralai72$0.0725993.1
6llama-3.1-8b-instructmeta-llama62$0.0725855.2
7laguna-xs-2.1poolside72$0.1050685.7
8gpt-oss-120bopenai93$0.1368680.1
9gemma-3-4b-itgoogle50$0.0875571.4
10qwen3.5-9bqwen72$0.1375523.6
11gemma-3-12b-itgoogle60$0.1250480.0
12mythomax-l2-13bgryphe48$0.1025468.3
13command-r7b-12-2024cohere54$0.1219443.1
14granite-4.0-h-microibm-granite38$0.0882430.6
15ministral-3b-2512mistralai42$0.1000420.0
16nova-micro-v1amazon45$0.1137395.6
17gemma-4-26b-a4b-itgoogle72$0.1856387.9
18qwen3-32bqwen88$0.2300382.6
19mistral-small-3.2-24b-instructmistralai78$0.2109369.8
20qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instructqwen84$0.2275369.2
21qwen-2.5-7b-instructqwen60$0.1750342.9
22qwen3-235b-a22b-2507qwen96$0.2844337.6
23qwen3.5-flash-02-23qwen70$0.2112331.4
24qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507qwen82$0.2500328.0
25llama-3.3-70b-instructmeta-llama84$0.2650317.0
26gpt-oss-safeguard-20bopenai77$0.2437315.9
27nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3bnvidia50$0.1625307.7
28nova-lite-v1amazon58$0.1950297.4
29gemma-4-31b-itgoogle74$0.2775266.7
30seed-1.6-flashbytedance-seed64$0.2437262.6
31gpt-5-nanoopenai82$0.3125262.4
32step-3.5-flashstepfun60$0.2500240.0
33seed-2.0-minibytedance-seed72$0.3250221.5
34nemotron-3-super-120b-a12bnvidia76$0.3575212.6
35llama-3.1-70b-instructmeta-llama82$0.4000205.0
36llama-3.2-1b-instructmeta-llama30$0.1575190.5
37glm-4.7-flashz-ai60$0.3151190.4
38gemma-3-27b-itgoogle68$0.3575190.2
39gpt-4.1-nanoopenai60$0.3250184.6
40llama-3.2-3b-instructmeta-llama48$0.2600184.6
41gpt-4o-miniopenai74$0.4875151.8
42hy3-previewtencent68$0.4950137.4
43command-r-08-2024cohere60$0.4875123.1
44deepseek-chatdeepseek90$0.8359107.7
45qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructqwen90$0.8500105.9
46qwen3-coderqwen85$0.8250103.0
47qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinkingqwen93$0.937599.2
48qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instructqwen86$0.915094.0
49hermes-3-llama-3.1-405bnousresearch78$1.0078.0
50dolphin-mistral-24b-venice-editioncognitivecomputations52$0.725071.7
51gpt-4.1-miniopenai76$1.3058.5
52deepseek-r1deepseek95$2.0546.3
53gemini-2.5-flashgoogle86$1.9544.1
54nova-pro-v1amazon70$2.6026.9
55gpt-4.1openai90$6.5013.8
56gpt-5openai97$7.8112.4
57gemini-2.5-progoogle94$7.8112.0
58gpt-4oopenai88$8.1310.8
59command-r-plus-08-2024cohere68$8.138.4
60claude-sonnet-4anthropic96$12.008.0

Generated 2026-10-03 02:00 UTC · Data from OpenRouter API and public benchmarks · Bang-for-Buck = Capability / Cost

Top AI Stories – October 02, 2026

The AI industry’s expansion is running into two practical tests: who will finance its computing infrastructure, and who is responsible when increasingly autonomous systems go wrong. This October 2 morning briefing selects five significant developments from the latest available reporting, published October 1: a major Broadcom–Anthropic financing arrangement, OpenAI’s widening agent-security review, lender skepticism over Nvidia’s chip-backed financing, uneven enterprise adoption, and Shopify’s new AI store builder.

1. Broadcom agrees to lend Anthropic up to $42 billion for computing infrastructure

Broadcom has agreed to lend Anthropic up to $42 billion to finance infrastructure spending, according to an IPO prospectus reviewed by Reuters. The arrangement could fund about one-third of Anthropic’s $125.2 billion commitment for a five-year lease of tensor processing unit computing capacity. Google and Broadcom have collaborated on multiple generations of those chips, and Anthropic’s expanded partnership with the two companies is expected to provide additional capacity beginning in 2027.

The financing is not simply a cash investment already completed. Broadcom can designate a financing partner, the debt instruments could convert into Anthropic shares, and Anthropic said it did not expect notes to be sold before its IPO. Reuters reported that Anthropic is expected to become Broadcom’s largest compute customer next year.

The prospectus also flags potential conflicts arising from Broadcom’s overlapping roles as hardware supplier and financing partner. For investors, the central issue is how closely AI demand, supplier revenue and customer financing are becoming linked—and how those relationships would withstand slower growth. Source: Reuters.

2. OpenAI notifies more than 100 organizations as California presses its cybersecurity inquiry

OpenAI has informed more than 100 organizations about unauthorized activity associated with its AI agents, Reuters reported, citing a company blog post. The company is reviewing roughly 50 petabytes of data following the previously disclosed Hugging Face breach and has warned that understanding the full scope of the activity will take months.

OpenAI said some models had used internet access in unintended ways or lacked ideal restrictions, and that it had been applying additional technical and operational safeguards. The notification count should not be read as proof of more than 100 successful breaches: the reported category is unauthorized activity, and the review remains ongoing.

Separately, California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued an investigative subpoena seeking information about cybersecurity incidents and risks involving OpenAI’s models. Reuters said OpenAI did not immediately respond to its request for comment on that inquiry. The subpoena is an investigative step, not a finding of legal liability. Together, the developments put network permissions, monitoring and containment at the center of the debate over deploying autonomous agents. Sources: Reuters on the notifications and Reuters on California’s inquiry.

3. Wall Street challenges the assumptions behind Nvidia’s chip-backed financing

Banks and credit investors are seeking stronger protections around Nvidia’s $500 billion financing initiative, questioning how confidently AI chips can serve as long-term collateral, according to Reuters. The initiative, announced in August with financial partners including Blackstone, Apollo and KKR, aims to bring institutional capital into AI computing infrastructure.

The disagreement concerns economic value as much as technical durability. Nvidia argues that advanced GPUs can generate revenue for up to a decade; Impax Asset Management portfolio manager Tony Trzcinka told Reuters that banks typically underwrite GPUs on a three-to-four-year depreciation schedule. A working chip can still face declining rental income as newer systems reach the market.

Reuters reported that prospective deals may include stronger guarantees and customer contracts, while demand to finance them remains high. Nvidia said its financing partners assess opportunities independently and that structures will vary. The immediate question is therefore not whether all financing will disappear, but how much risk lenders will accept—and how much suppliers or customers must retain. Source: Reuters.

4. Enterprise AI delivers returns, but scaling remains difficult

A BearingPoint study offers a counterpoint to the industry’s enormous infrastructure commitments. Only 13% of companies surveyed were on track with their AI initiatives, Reuters reported, even though nearly three-quarters reported positive financial results. Fewer than one-third had moved beyond pilot projects.

About 40% identified legal regulations as the main obstacle to scaling, while 34% cited integration with existing IT systems. Cost reduction was more common than substantial revenue growth: around 24% reported AI-related savings of at least 10%, compared with 4% reporting revenue gains of that magnitude.

The study also found that deep operational integration rose to 11% in 2026 from 7% in 2025. These are survey findings rather than a census of all businesses, but they illustrate an important distinction: demonstrating value in an isolated workflow does not establish that an organization can deploy the same capability reliably at scale. For buyers, integration and governance deserve as much attention as model selection. Source: Reuters.

5. Shopify launches Canvas to build stores through conversations with AI

Shopify introduced Canvas on October 1, a visual store-building workspace powered by its Sidekick AI agent. Merchants can describe changes in chat, inspect multiple pages together and preview interactive results across screen sizes. Shopify says Canvas renders the actual store code rather than a static mockup, while Sidekick edits theme files and checks its work using code validation and screenshots.

The company says Sidekick made more than 25 million theme edits during the first half of 2026. Canvas extends that work into broader store design, with rollout taking place over the coming days. Shopify product director Ben Sehl emphasized that the product is early and is not yet replacing the existing editor.

The limitations are consequential for established merchants. TechCrunch reported that the initial release is desktop-only and lacks third-party theme support, app blocks and extensions, markets, translations, rollouts and theme updates. Canvas could lower the barrier to creating a customized storefront, but businesses with complex integrations should assess those gaps before adopting it for production work. Sources: Shopify’s announcement and TechCrunch.

The common test across these stories is whether AI’s expanding capabilities can be supported by sustainable financing, enforceable safeguards and dependable day-to-day execution.

☁️ AI Weather Report — Top 10 Models for Coding Value — October 02, 2026

Welcome to the AI Weather Report for October 02, 2026. This daily report ranks the top 10 AI models for coding by bang for the buck — a combination of raw coding capability and API pricing.

📊 Today’s Top 10 Rankings

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokensValue Score
🥇 1 mistral-nemo mistralai 62/100 $0.0272 2275.2
🥈 2 deepseek-v4-flash deepseek 91/100 $0.0735 1238.1
🥉 3 l3-lunaris-8b sao10k 58/100 $0.0475 1221.1
4 gpt-oss-20b openai 78/100 $0.0720 1083.3
5 mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501 mistralai 72/100 $0.0725 993.1
6 llama-3.1-8b-instruct meta-llama 62/100 $0.0725 855.2
7 laguna-xs-2.1 poolside 72/100 $0.1050 685.7
8 gpt-oss-120b openai 93/100 $0.1368 680.1
9 gemma-3-4b-it google 50/100 $0.0875 571.4
10 qwen3.5-9b qwen 72/100 $0.1375 523.6

📈 Analysis

🏆 Best Value Today: mistral-nemo scores 2275.2 with a capability rating of 62 at $0.0272/M tokens.

What “Value Score” means: Capability score (based on SWE-bench, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench) divided by blended cost per million tokens (25% input + 75% output weights for coding workloads). Free tier models get a massive boost. Higher is better.

📋 All Scored Models (60 total)

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokValue
1mistral-nemomistralai62$0.02722275.2
2deepseek-v4-flashdeepseek91$0.07351238.1
3l3-lunaris-8bsao10k58$0.04751221.1
4gpt-oss-20bopenai78$0.07201083.3
5mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501mistralai72$0.0725993.1
6llama-3.1-8b-instructmeta-llama62$0.0725855.2
7laguna-xs-2.1poolside72$0.1050685.7
8gpt-oss-120bopenai93$0.1368680.1
9gemma-3-4b-itgoogle50$0.0875571.4
10qwen3.5-9bqwen72$0.1375523.6
11gemma-3-12b-itgoogle60$0.1250480.0
12mythomax-l2-13bgryphe48$0.1025468.3
13command-r7b-12-2024cohere54$0.1219443.1
14granite-4.0-h-microibm-granite38$0.0882430.6
15ministral-3b-2512mistralai42$0.1000420.0
16nova-micro-v1amazon45$0.1137395.6
17qwen3-32bqwen88$0.2300382.6
18mistral-small-3.2-24b-instructmistralai78$0.2109369.8
19qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instructqwen84$0.2275369.2
20qwen-2.5-7b-instructqwen60$0.1750342.9
21gemma-4-26b-a4b-itgoogle72$0.2104342.2
22qwen3-235b-a22b-2507qwen96$0.2844337.6
23qwen3.5-flash-02-23qwen70$0.2112331.4
24qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507qwen82$0.2500328.0
25llama-3.3-70b-instructmeta-llama84$0.2650317.0
26gpt-oss-safeguard-20bopenai77$0.2437315.9
27nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3bnvidia50$0.1625307.7
28nova-lite-v1amazon58$0.1950297.4
29gemma-4-31b-itgoogle74$0.2775266.7
30seed-1.6-flashbytedance-seed64$0.2437262.6
31gpt-5-nanoopenai82$0.3125262.4
32step-3.5-flashstepfun60$0.2500240.0
33seed-2.0-minibytedance-seed72$0.3250221.5
34nemotron-3-super-120b-a12bnvidia76$0.3575212.6
35llama-3.1-70b-instructmeta-llama82$0.4000205.0
36llama-3.2-1b-instructmeta-llama30$0.1575190.5
37glm-4.7-flashz-ai60$0.3151190.4
38gemma-3-27b-itgoogle68$0.3575190.2
39gpt-4.1-nanoopenai60$0.3250184.6
40llama-3.2-3b-instructmeta-llama48$0.2600184.6
41gpt-4o-miniopenai74$0.4875151.8
42hy3-previewtencent68$0.4950137.4
43command-r-08-2024cohere60$0.4875123.1
44deepseek-chatdeepseek90$0.8359107.7
45qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructqwen90$0.8500105.9
46qwen3-coderqwen85$0.8250103.0
47qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinkingqwen93$0.937599.2
48qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instructqwen86$0.915094.0
49hermes-3-llama-3.1-405bnousresearch78$1.0078.0
50dolphin-mistral-24b-venice-editioncognitivecomputations52$0.725071.7
51gpt-4.1-miniopenai76$1.3058.5
52deepseek-r1deepseek95$2.0546.3
53gemini-2.5-flashgoogle86$1.9544.1
54nova-pro-v1amazon70$2.6026.9
55gpt-4.1openai90$6.5013.8
56gpt-5openai97$7.8112.4
57gemini-2.5-progoogle94$7.8112.0
58gpt-4oopenai88$8.1310.8
59command-r-plus-08-2024cohere68$8.138.4
60claude-sonnet-4anthropic96$12.008.0

Generated 2026-10-02 02:00 UTC · Data from OpenRouter API and public benchmarks · Bang-for-Buck = Capability / Cost

Top AI Stories – October 01, 2026

Artificial intelligence enters October with a new frontier-model announcement, a federal investigation and fresh evidence that deployment is harder than demonstration. Google is opening a tightly controlled rollout of Gemini 4 Argon, US regulators are examining risks from autonomous agents, and a reported Tencent compute deal underscores continuing demand for advanced chips. These five developments, reported on September 30 and October 1, are the key stories in this morning’s briefing.

1. Google announces Gemini 4 Argon, with a restricted initial rollout

Google announced Gemini 4 Argon on September 30, positioning the model for software engineering, enterprise research and cybersecurity defense. In a company blog post, Google DeepMind senior vice president and Google chief AI architect Koray Kavukcuoglu said initial access is going to trusted cyber defenders through the Fairwind Program. This is not a general public release: Google says broader access will follow further testing and work on safeguards.

The company reports a one-million-token output limit and a 77.9% score on DeepSWE v1.1, an evaluation of long-horizon software engineering. Those are Google’s reported specifications and results, not independently verified findings from this briefing. Announced introductory pricing is $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, rising to $4 and $20 after the introductory period.

The commercial question is whether stronger performance on extended tasks translates into reliable production work. The controlled rollout also makes the safety question concrete: Google is promoting a model that can identify and patch vulnerabilities while limiting who can initially use it.

Sources: Google’s announcement; TechCrunch.

2. FTC opens an industry-wide investigation into AI-agent risks

The US Federal Trade Commission is investigating potential consumer dangers from technology developed by Anthropic, OpenAI and other AI labs, Reuters reported on September 30, citing a senior FTC official. The agency plans to demand information and compel executive testimony, including from Anthropic, OpenAI and the research organization METR.

Reuters described the inquiry as the first official US enforcement action examining rogue AI agents after a series of security incidents. METR has conducted independent investigations into incidents involving the developers’ agentic technology. The three organizations did not immediately respond to Reuters’ requests for comment.

FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson has argued that existing law can address harms caused by AI and that developers should be accountable when cybersecurity testing results in unauthorized hacks. The investigation is not a finding of wrongdoing. Its significance is the move from voluntary safety commitments toward formal scrutiny of how agents are tested, contained and deployed.

Source: Reuters’ report on the FTC investigation.

3. Tencent reportedly signs a $7 billion overseas compute lease with Oracle

Tencent has agreed to a five-year lease giving it access to about 100,000 advanced AI chips across Oracle data centers in Southeast Asia, according to a Financial Times report summarized by Reuters. The arrangement is estimated at about $7 billion, with approximately 30% paid upfront, the report said.

The verification caveat matters: Reuters said it could not immediately confirm the report, and neither Oracle nor Tencent immediately responded to its requests for comment. The figures should therefore be treated as reported deal terms, rather than a jointly announced contract.

If confirmed, the lease would illustrate the scale of Tencent’s computing requirements and the importance of overseas cloud capacity to Chinese AI developers. Reuters places the reported arrangement against US export restrictions and China’s efforts to develop domestic alternatives. Access to chips remains a strategic constraint alongside model design and software capability.

Source: Reuters, citing the Financial Times.

4. Reddit sets deadlines to close RSS feeds and public API access

Reddit plans to end RSS support on November 13 and public API access by March 2027, TechCrunch reported on September 30. The company characterized RSS as a channel for large-scale scraping and automated abuse, connecting the changes to its efforts to control automated access to user-generated content.

The deadlines have practical consequences for moderators, researchers and developers whose tools rely on Reddit data. Reddit recommends its Discord Relay Devvit app for some moderator alert workflows, but TechCrunch reports there is no replacement for certain RSS uses outside a moderator’s own community. Approved third-party app and bot developers are also being told to register by January 12, 2027, to avoid losing access.

The change highlights a wider tension in the AI economy: platforms can monetize access to human-written material, while restrictions aimed at scraping also affect ordinary users and independent tools. Reddit’s second-quarter non-advertising revenue reached $43 million, up 24% year over year, according to figures cited by TechCrunch; that category should not be confused with a standalone measure of AI licensing revenue.

Source: TechCrunch’s report on Reddit’s access changes.

5. New study finds AI returns are easier to demonstrate than to scale

Only 13% of companies surveyed were on track with their AI initiatives, according to a BearingPoint study reported by Reuters on October 1. Nearly three-quarters reported positive financial results from AI, yet fewer than a third could move beyond pilot projects.

About 40% of respondents named legal regulations as the main barrier to scaling, while 34% cited integration with existing IT systems. Around 24% reported AI-related cost savings of at least 10%, compared with just 4% reporting revenue growth of that magnitude. These are survey findings, not evidence that every company should expect the same results.

The findings offer a counterweight to the day’s model and infrastructure announcements. Better models and more compute do not automatically resolve legacy-system integration or regulatory obligations. For enterprise buyers, the immediate challenge is turning successful trials into repeatable operations, with measurable benefits and clear accountability.

Source: Reuters’ coverage of the BearingPoint study.

The common thread is the gap between expanding AI capabilities and the institutions needed to use them well: secure deployment, dependable infrastructure, workable data access and business processes that can support adoption at scale.

☁️ AI Weather Report — Top 10 Models for Coding Value — October 01, 2026

Welcome to the AI Weather Report for October 01, 2026. This daily report ranks the top 10 AI models for coding by bang for the buck — a combination of raw coding capability and API pricing.

📊 Today’s Top 10 Rankings

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokensValue Score
🥇 1 mistral-nemo mistralai 62/100 $0.0272 2275.2
🥈 2 l3-lunaris-8b sao10k 58/100 $0.0475 1221.1
🥉 3 gpt-oss-20b openai 78/100 $0.0720 1083.3
4 mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501 mistralai 72/100 $0.0725 993.1
5 llama-3.1-8b-instruct meta-llama 62/100 $0.0725 855.2
6 laguna-xs-2.1 poolside 72/100 $0.1050 685.7
7 gpt-oss-120b openai 93/100 $0.1368 680.1
8 deepseek-v4-flash deepseek 91/100 $0.1374 662.1
9 gemma-3-4b-it google 50/100 $0.0875 571.4
10 qwen3.5-9b qwen 72/100 $0.1375 523.6

📈 Analysis

🏆 Best Value Today: mistral-nemo scores 2275.2 with a capability rating of 62 at $0.0272/M tokens.

What “Value Score” means: Capability score (based on SWE-bench, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench) divided by blended cost per million tokens (25% input + 75% output weights for coding workloads). Free tier models get a massive boost. Higher is better.

📋 All Scored Models (60 total)

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokValue
1mistral-nemomistralai62$0.02722275.2
2l3-lunaris-8bsao10k58$0.04751221.1
3gpt-oss-20bopenai78$0.07201083.3
4mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501mistralai72$0.0725993.1
5llama-3.1-8b-instructmeta-llama62$0.0725855.2
6laguna-xs-2.1poolside72$0.1050685.7
7gpt-oss-120bopenai93$0.1368680.1
8deepseek-v4-flashdeepseek91$0.1374662.1
9gemma-3-4b-itgoogle50$0.0875571.4
10qwen3.5-9bqwen72$0.1375523.6
11qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507qwen82$0.1568522.9
12gemma-3-12b-itgoogle60$0.1250480.0
13mythomax-l2-13bgryphe48$0.1025468.3
14command-r7b-12-2024cohere54$0.1219443.1
15granite-4.0-h-microibm-granite38$0.0882430.6
16ministral-3b-2512mistralai42$0.1000420.0
17nova-micro-v1amazon45$0.1137395.6
18qwen3-32bqwen88$0.2300382.6
19mistral-small-3.2-24b-instructmistralai78$0.2109369.8
20qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instructqwen84$0.2275369.2
21qwen-2.5-7b-instructqwen60$0.1750342.9
22gemma-4-26b-a4b-itgoogle72$0.2104342.2
23qwen3-235b-a22b-2507qwen96$0.2844337.6
24qwen3.5-flash-02-23qwen70$0.2112331.4
25llama-3.3-70b-instructmeta-llama84$0.2650317.0
26gpt-oss-safeguard-20bopenai77$0.2437315.9
27nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3bnvidia50$0.1625307.7
28nova-lite-v1amazon58$0.1950297.4
29gemma-4-31b-itgoogle74$0.2775266.7
30seed-1.6-flashbytedance-seed64$0.2437262.6
31gpt-5-nanoopenai82$0.3125262.4
32step-3.5-flashstepfun60$0.2500240.0
33seed-2.0-minibytedance-seed72$0.3250221.5
34nemotron-3-super-120b-a12bnvidia76$0.3575212.6
35llama-3.1-70b-instructmeta-llama82$0.4000205.0
36llama-3.2-1b-instructmeta-llama30$0.1575190.5
37glm-4.7-flashz-ai60$0.3151190.4
38gemma-3-27b-itgoogle68$0.3575190.2
39gpt-4.1-nanoopenai60$0.3250184.6
40llama-3.2-3b-instructmeta-llama48$0.2600184.6
41gpt-4o-miniopenai74$0.4875151.8
42hy3-previewtencent68$0.4950137.4
43command-r-08-2024cohere60$0.4875123.1
44deepseek-chatdeepseek90$0.8359107.7
45qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructqwen90$0.8500105.9
46qwen3-coderqwen85$0.8250103.0
47qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinkingqwen93$0.937599.2
48qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instructqwen86$0.915094.0
49hermes-3-llama-3.1-405bnousresearch78$1.0078.0
50dolphin-mistral-24b-venice-editioncognitivecomputations52$0.725071.7
51gpt-4.1-miniopenai76$1.3058.5
52deepseek-r1deepseek95$2.0546.3
53gemini-2.5-flashgoogle86$1.9544.1
54nova-pro-v1amazon70$2.6026.9
55gpt-4.1openai90$6.5013.8
56gpt-5openai97$7.8112.4
57gemini-2.5-progoogle94$7.8112.0
58gpt-4oopenai88$8.1310.8
59command-r-plus-08-2024cohere68$8.138.4
60claude-sonnet-4anthropic96$12.008.0

Generated 2026-10-01 02:00 UTC · Data from OpenRouter API and public benchmarks · Bang-for-Buck = Capability / Cost