Top AI Stories – August 19, 2026

Five stories shaped the AI landscape this week: an apparent effort to steer chatbot answers on a politically charged topic, new pricing and fresh independent benchmarks for OpenAI’s flagship model, an autonomous security agent beating its own AI coding colleagues to a critical vulnerability, and Anthropic quietly extending — for now — the higher usage limits in Claude Code.

Israel-linked firm reportedly created a fake think tank to influence AI chatbots

Investigative outlet Responsible Statecraft reported that a think tank called the Hanover Institute for Public Policy, which bills itself as studying antisemitism in the United States, appears to be a fabricated front designed to steer the answers of AI chatbots. The publication found that in just over a week the organization published at least 100 reports, all focused on Israel and Palestine, with no bylines and a boilerplate disclaimer noting the outfit was created “on behalf of the Israeli Government Advertising Agency” by Piro, Inc., a firm co-founded by Daniel Rosenberg, a producer on Spike Lee’s “Inside Man.”

The reports are deliberately structured to be credible to large language models — complete with footnotes, tables of contents, and a neutral tone. Piro advertises “AI Story Optimization,” a service described as “content engineered for how LLMs evaluate credibility,” a practice critics call “LLM poisoning.” The outlet’s reporting claimed incidents such as a survey about whether the IDF is “the world’s most moral army” being cited in the institute’s materials, alongside reports casting doubt on UNICEF figures about infrastructure damage in Gaza.

OpenRouter cuts GPT-5.6 Sol pricing by 50%

OpenRouter dropped the price of OpenAI’s flagship reasoning model, GPT-5.6 Sol, by 50 percent, bringing the API cost to $2.50 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens. The model, released July 9, 2026, carries a 1.05-million-token context window and supports up to 128,000 output tokens. Cache reads are priced at $0.25 per million tokens, with a separate web-search rate of $10 per 1,000 calls, and OpenRouter routes the model across OpenAI, Azure (EU), and Amazon Bedrock (US) providers with automatic failover. The price cut arrives as OpenAI focuses on efficiency relative to competitors — a theme increasingly shaping the model market.

Autonomous security agent found a vulnerability AI coding tools missed

Wiz Research said its autonomous AI security agent, “Red Agent,” discovered and exploited a critical GitHub Actions injection vulnerability in Snowflake’s public snowflake-connector-net repository — a flaw that passed GitHub Advanced Security’s scans and was merged as part of a pull request co-authored by GitHub Copilot.

The vulnerability, live since June 18, 2026, allowed any GitHub user to execute arbitrary commands in a workflow runner simply by opening an issue with a specially crafted title. An untrusted issue title was interpolated into a shell script with a single quote escaping the intended input. Wiz’s Red Agent flagged the injectable jira_issue.yml workflow, exploited it to exfiltrate a credential and gain access to Snowflake’s internal Jira, and assessed the blast radius — all without human intervention, five days after the flaw went live. Wiz disclosed the issue on June 23, 2026, Snowflake remediated it the same day and rotated the affected credential, and Wiz confirmed all accessed data was securely deleted. The case illustrates a new reality: AI-assisted code can still ship critical vulnerabilities past automated checks, while autonomous AI security agents can find and exploit them faster.

GPT-5.6 Sol ranks as OpenAI’s best vision model in Roboflow benchmark

Computer-vision platform Roboflow reported that GPT-5.6 Sol is “clearly the best vision model OpenAI has released so far,” based on tests across detection, counting, OCR, and data extraction. The jump is most visible in object detection: GPT-5.5 scored 13.8 mAP@50 in the benchmark, while Sol reached 46.2, with Terra and Luna following at 44.7 and 43.3 — moving object detection “from a major weakness to a practical capability.”

Sol also handled document layout detection well, including titles, paragraphs, tables, images, and signatures, and performed strongly on dense scenes such as pills and eggs. Roboflow attributes the gains to improved visual understanding that underpins OpenAI’s newer computer-use and UI-agent features, which depend on models navigating and operating desktop applications. Terra and Luna showed “meaningful progress” over GPT-5.5 without matching Sol.

Anthropic extends Claude Code’s higher usage limits

Anthropic extended its Claude Code weekly usage-limit promotion for May through August 2026, per its support documentation and a statement from the company’s developer account. The promotion raised weekly limits in Claude Code by 50 percent from May 13 through August 19, 2026, and Anthropic has now said it plans to extend the higher limits through August 31 and make them permanent. The move comes as users weigh token-hungry “vibe coding” workflows against rivals’ efficiency, with several commenters noting they have shifted to OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol or Codex amid outages and limit uncertainty. The extension signals Anthropic’s attempt to hold on to heavy Claude Code users while managing compute capacity.

Sources: Responsible Statecraft, OpenRouter, Wiz Research, Roboflow, Anthropic / Hacker News.

Top AI Stories – August 18, 2026

From Anthropic’s new text watermarking for EU compliance to a security incident that highlights the risks of AI-generated code, OpenAI cutting flagship pricing in half, and Nvidia reining in its record OpenAI data-center financing — here are the top AI stories for August 18, 2026.

Anthropic Rolls Out Text Watermarking Across Claude

Anthropic announced that future Claude models will generate text carrying an invisible watermark, a cryptographic signature designed to reveal how likely it is that Claude created the text. Announced August 14, the move is driven by compliance with the EU AI Act: the EU began requiring AI providers serving its market to mark AI-generated content as of August 2. Anthropic, “along with several other major AI providers” and roughly 190 signatories, signed the EU Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content in July 2026.

The technique is a version of Google DeepMind’s SynthID-Text approach, published in Nature in 2024, and traces back to a 2022 Scott Aaronson proposal. Rather than adding hidden characters or extra tokens, it subtly changes the source of randomness the model uses to choose among equally good next words. Readers cannot perceive the difference, Anthropic says, and testing shows no impact on quality, creativity, or readability. The watermark carries no identifying information and cannot be traced to a user or organization, and code — where exact output is required — generally carries far less watermarking than prose.

Anthropic is also attaching C2PA content credentials to images and files it produces, and plans to offer a watermark detection API. Notably, the announcement has drawn sharp criticism in the developer community: writing on Daring Fireball, John Gruber called the practice a “perversion of writing,” arguing that a tool shouldn’t sacrifice any clarity for provenance, while commenters on Hacker News raised concerns that verifying a watermark would require sending entire texts to Anthropic.

Anthropic Publishes Claude’s System Prompts

In a transparency push that drew strong community interest this week, Anthropic published the system prompts used by Claude’s web and mobile apps, documenting how the model is instructed to behave. The prompts reveal notable evolution: early system prompts were just over 300 words, while the latest run to more than 3,000 words.

Among the details surfaced are guardrails instructing Claude to prioritize a person’s wellbeing if they express distress, a “default stance” that Claude helps unless doing so would create a concrete, specific risk of serious harm, and a safeguards-routing mechanism that can redirect certain queries intended for Anthropic’s most capable model, Fable 5, to Opus 5 instead. Community observers noted the prompts apply to Anthropic’s consumer chat products rather than the API, and that they are prefix-cached to keep performance and cost impact low.

OpenAI Cuts GPT-5.6 Sol Pricing by Half

OpenAI has cut the price of its flagship GPT-5.6 Sol model by 50%, bringing it to $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens at standard API rates. The move follows earlier reductions to the GPT-5.6 family — Luna by 80% and Terra by 20% — as OpenAI works to sharpen its pricing amid intense frontier-model competition.

GPT-5.6 spans three tiers: Sol (flagship), Terra (a balanced, lower-cost model competitive with GPT-5.5), and Luna (fastest and most affordable, at $1/$6). The family introduced a new max reasoning mode, and OpenAI reports Sol sets state-of-the-art results on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index at 80 points while using fewer tokens and less time than rivals. Sol also introduced a new tiered naming system where the number represents a generation and Sol/Terra/Luna represent durable capability levels that advance on their own cadence. Developers and independent reviewers have questioned how the models can be so efficient at such low price points, though the cuts position OpenAI aggressively against competitors.

AI-Generated “Autofix” Code Let Researchers into Snowflake’s Jira

Wiz Research’s autonomous security tool, Red Agent, exposed a vulnerability in Snowflake’s public repositories that traced back to code reviewed and merged with GitHub Copilot’s AI-generated Autofix. The finding offers a striking cautionary tale about AI-assisted software development.

Wiz flagged a script-injection vulnerability in the jira_issue.yml GitHub Actions workflow inside Snowflake’s snowflake-connector-net repository: crafted issue titles could trigger arbitrary command execution and expose a Jira API token. Critically, the vulnerable workflow was merged in PR #1218 on June 18, 2026, co-authored by Copilot Autofix. Wiz identified, exploited, and responsibly disclosed the issue via Snowflake’s HackerOne program on June 23; Snowflake remediated the same day, rotated the affected credential, and confirmed via audit logs that Wiz was the sole actor during the exposure window. The incident sparked debate over whether automated AI merge-and-fix pipelines can introduce security flaws too subtle for fast-moving teams to catch.

Nvidia Scales Back Its Massive OpenAI Data-Center Guarantee

Nvidia and OpenAI are reworking the financing for a planned 10-gigawatt data-center campus in Ohio, with the chipmaker now planning to backstop only about half of the multi-hundred-billion-dollar build-out rather than all of it, according to the Wall Street Journal. Earlier reports had pegged the guarantee at roughly $250 billion — one of the most ambitious financing transactions of the AI boom — with Nvidia also discussing financing OpenAI chip purchases of up to $350 billion.

Under the proposed new terms, Nvidia would initially backstop half of the project, a structure designed to reassure lenders about the project’s funding. Nvidia shares fell 5% when the initial $250 billion figure was first reported. The renegotiation underscores the enormous capital demands of frontier AI infrastructure and the growing caution among financiers as they weigh the long payback horizons of AI data centers.

That’s a look at the top AI stories for today. As AI regulation, model pricing, security, and infrastructure financing all accelerate, the frontier continues to move quickly — we’ll keep you posted on what matters.

☁️ AI Weather Report — Top 10 Models for Coding Value — August 18, 2026

Welcome to the AI Weather Report for August 18, 2026. This daily report ranks the top 10 AI models for coding by bang for the buck — a combination of raw coding capability and API pricing.

📊 Today’s Top 10 Rankings

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokensValue Score
🥇 1 mistral-nemo mistralai 62/100 $0.0272 2275.2
🥈 2 ling-2.6-flash inclusionai 56/100 $0.0250 2240.0
🥉 3 l3-lunaris-8b sao10k 58/100 $0.0475 1221.1
4 mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501 mistralai 72/100 $0.0725 993.1
5 llama-3.1-8b-instruct meta-llama 62/100 $0.0725 855.2
6 mythomax-l2-13b gryphe 48/100 $0.0600 800.0
7 gpt-oss-20b openai 78/100 $0.1050 742.9
8 gpt-oss-120b openai 93/100 $0.1350 688.9
9 laguna-xs-2.1 poolside 72/100 $0.1050 685.7
10 deepseek-v4-flash deepseek 91/100 $0.1445 629.5

📈 Analysis

🏆 Best Value Today: mistral-nemo scores 2275.2 with a capability rating of 62 at $0.0272/M tokens.

💵 Cheapest Premium Model: ling-2.6-flash at $0.0250/M tokens (capability: 56).

What “Value Score” means: Capability score (based on SWE-bench, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench) divided by blended cost per million tokens (25% input + 75% output weights for coding workloads). Free tier models get a massive boost. Higher is better.

📋 All Scored Models (66 total)

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokValue
1mistral-nemomistralai62$0.02722275.2
2ling-2.6-flashinclusionai56$0.02502240.0
3l3-lunaris-8bsao10k58$0.04751221.1
4mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501mistralai72$0.0725993.1
5llama-3.1-8b-instructmeta-llama62$0.0725855.2
6mythomax-l2-13bgryphe48$0.0600800.0
7gpt-oss-20bopenai78$0.1050742.9
8gpt-oss-120bopenai93$0.1350688.9
9laguna-xs-2.1poolside72$0.1050685.7
10deepseek-v4-flashdeepseek91$0.1445629.5
11gemma-3-4b-itgoogle50$0.0875571.4
12granite-4.1-8bibm-granite48$0.0875548.6
13qwen3.5-9bqwen72$0.1375523.6
14qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507qwen82$0.1568522.9
15gemma-3-12b-itgoogle60$0.1250480.0
16command-r7b-12-2024cohere54$0.1219443.1
17granite-4.0-h-microibm-granite38$0.0882430.6
18ministral-3b-2512mistralai42$0.1000420.0
19nova-micro-v1amazon45$0.1137395.6
20qwen3-32bqwen88$0.2300382.6
21mistral-small-3.2-24b-instructmistralai78$0.2109369.8
22qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instructqwen84$0.2275369.2
23qwen-2.5-7b-instructqwen60$0.1750342.9
24qwen3.5-flash-02-23qwen70$0.2112331.4
25llama-3.3-70b-instructmeta-llama84$0.2650317.0
26gpt-oss-safeguard-20bopenai77$0.2437315.9
27nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3bnvidia50$0.1625307.7
28nova-lite-v1amazon58$0.1950297.4
29gemma-4-31b-itgoogle74$0.2800264.3
30gemma-4-26b-a4b-itgoogle72$0.2725264.2
31seed-1.6-flashbytedance-seed64$0.2437262.6
32gpt-5-nanoopenai82$0.3125262.4
33step-3.5-flashstepfun60$0.2500240.0
34nemotron-3-super-120b-a12bnvidia76$0.3212236.6
35seed-2.0-minibytedance-seed72$0.3250221.5
36qwen3-235b-a22b-2507qwen96$0.4350220.7
37llama-3.1-70b-instructmeta-llama82$0.4000205.0
38llama-3.2-1b-instructmeta-llama30$0.1575190.5
39glm-4.7-flashz-ai60$0.3150190.5
40gemma-3-27b-itgoogle68$0.3575190.2
41gpt-4.1-nanoopenai60$0.3250184.6
42llama-3.2-3b-instructmeta-llama48$0.2600184.6
43ring-2.6-1tinclusionai78$0.4875160.0
44gpt-4o-miniopenai74$0.4875151.8
45ling-2.6-1tinclusionai74$0.4875151.8
46hy3-previewtencent68$0.4950137.4
47command-r-08-2024cohere60$0.4875123.1
48deepseek-chatdeepseek90$0.8359107.7
49qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructqwen90$0.8500105.9
50qwen3-coderqwen85$0.8250103.0
51qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinkingqwen93$0.937599.2
52qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instructqwen86$0.915094.0
53hermes-3-llama-3.1-405bnousresearch78$1.0078.0
54claude-3-haikuanthropic72$1.0072.0
55dolphin-mistral-24b-venice-editioncognitivecomputations52$0.725071.7
56gpt-4.1-miniopenai76$1.3058.5
57deepseek-r1deepseek95$2.0546.3
58gemini-2.5-flashgoogle86$1.9544.1
59nova-pro-v1amazon70$2.6026.9
60gpt-4.1openai90$6.5013.8
61gpt-5openai97$7.8112.4
62gemini-2.5-progoogle94$7.8112.0
63gpt-4oopenai88$8.1310.8
64command-r-plus-08-2024cohere68$8.138.4
65claude-sonnet-4anthropic96$12.008.0
66claude-opus-4anthropic98$60.001.6

Generated 2026-08-18 02:00 UTC · Data from OpenRouter API and public benchmarks · Bang-for-Buck = Capability / Cost

Top AI Stories – August 17, 2026

From a brewing controversy over Anthropic’s text watermarking to a shake-up atop the executive ranks at OpenAI, the world of artificial intelligence saw another busy week of news. Here are the five biggest AI stories to know about as of August 17, 2026.

1. Anthropic’s Claude text watermarking sparks a writer backlash

Anthropic is rolling out a cryptographic-style watermark for Claude’s text output across all its models worldwide, a move the company says is designed to comply with the EU AI Act’s transparency code for labeling AI-generated content. But the implementation is drawing sharp criticism from prominent voices and users alike.

Rather than inserting invisible characters, Anthropic’s approach is a form of steganography: at each next-token decision point, the model is slightly more likely to choose words from a secret-key-derived “green” list than a “red” list, leaving a statistically detectable fingerprint that only Anthropic (holding the secret key) can verify. In a detailed and sharply worded essay, Daring Fireball‘s John Gruber called the practice a “perversion of writing,” arguing that no two synonyms carry exactly the same meaning and that adulterating word choice to embed hidden provenance clues sacrifices clarity and precision. He also noted the watermark applies to text longer than about 200 tokens (~150 words) and even to text the model merely processes, such as proofreading or summarizing.

On Reddit and social media, users voiced a range of reactions—some furious, arguing it would out them for using the tool at work or school, others supportive, saying it is a sensible way to track algorithmically generated material. TechCrunch reported that one user called the watermarks “unethical” and “disgusting,” while another noted the irony of watermarking a product trained on others’ work. Anthropic framed the rollout as part of its compliance obligations under European regulation, but the design decision—and whether Anthropic alone can detect its own marks—has become a flashpoint in the broader debate over AI provenance.

2. OpenAI reshuffles its executive team ahead of a possible IPO

OpenAI is in the midst of a significant executive shake-up. The company has replaced chief revenue officer Denise Dresser after just nine months on the job, tapping Dali Rajic—previously president and chief operating officer of Wiz, the cybersecurity firm Google acquired for a record $32 billion earlier this year—to take on the top sales role.

The change comes amid a broader wave of departures. Longtime chief operating officer Brad Lightcap announced he is leaving after eight years to start a new venture, saying in a note that it was “bittersweet to share that I’ll be moving on from OpenAI to start something new.” Fidji Simo, who served as OpenAI’s No. 2 executive as CEO of AGI deployment, stepped down last month, and chief marketing officer Kate Rouch departed in the spring. OpenAI president and co-founder Greg Brockman has taken on a larger management role and announced Rajic’s appointment. The reshuffle is happening as OpenAI, which says its products reach more than one billion weekly active users and two million businesses, prepares for a possible IPO—having filed confidentially with the SEC—and completes a reported $7 billion employee tender offer.

3. Nvidia scales back its OpenAI data center financing guarantee

Nvidia is dialing back a giant planned financial backstop for an OpenAI data-center campus in Ohio. According to the Wall Street Journal, the chipmaker is now expected to initially guarantee less than $120 billion of the project—down from the roughly $250 billion guarantee previously discussed, which investors had flagged as a growing risk-exposure concern.

Under the reworked terms, Nvidia would initially backstop only about half of the planned multi-hundred-billion-dollar, multi-gigawatt build-out rather than the entire project. Nvidia shares fell 5% earlier this month when the $250 billion discussions were first reported; the revision reflects investor unease about the chipmaker using its balance sheet to guarantee demand for its AI chips. The deal is part of a broader trend of Nvidia, OpenAI, and other players crafting increasingly ambitious financial structures to fund the enormous capital needs of the AI build-out.

4. DeepSeek launches V4 Pro at a premium price

Chinese AI startup DeepSeek has formally released V4 Pro, pricing the flagship model several times higher than its V4 Flash model as it tries to convert stronger benchmark performance into premium revenue. Independent benchmarking firm Artificial Analysis lists V4-Pro-0813 at $1.32 per million input tokens and $3.96 per million output tokens—roughly 9 times the input price and 14 times the output price of V4 Flash.

DeepSeek said V4 Pro substantially improves agentic capabilities and is available across its API, app, and web products. The company also said it will raise API pricing on both models and introduce peak and off-peak pricing. Artificial Analysis gave the reasoning version of V4 Pro a score of 53 on its Intelligence Index versus 40 for V4 Flash. The launch is part of DeepSeek’s effort to regain momentum after its viral R1 model in early 2025, and follows reported plans for a fundraising round at a valuation of around $74 billion, coming weeks after raising about $7.4 billion in its first outside financing round in June.

5. SpaceXAI unveils Grok 4.6, claiming frontier performance at lower cost

SpaceXAI introduced Grok 4.6 on August 12, positioning the model as delivering frontier-level performance on par with leading rivals while being substantially cheaper than comparable models from OpenAI and Anthropic. According to the company, Grok 4.6 reaches frontier intelligence across several agentic, coding, and knowledge-work benchmarks, and is on par on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index with GPT-5.6 Sol.

Built atop Grok 4.5 with a focus on long-running agents and ambitious interactive visual work, the model was trained with AI-generated data focused on reasoning, STEM, software engineering, and knowledge work—with Grok 4.5 drafting training examples that were filtered by automated checks. It was then post-trained through reinforcement learning on coding, web development, computer-aided design, and software optimization. Grok 4.6 is currently available in Cursor and Grok Build, and SpaceXAI says it can research a topic, plan an application, build its core features, test its own work, and refine results across multiple rounds of feedback.

That’s a look at the top AI stories of the day. As models, companies, and the economics of the AI boom continue to evolve, expect plenty more developments in the week ahead.

☁️ AI Weather Report — Top 10 Models for Coding Value — August 17, 2026

Welcome to the AI Weather Report for August 17, 2026. This daily report ranks the top 10 AI models for coding by bang for the buck — a combination of raw coding capability and API pricing.

📊 Today’s Top 10 Rankings

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokensValue Score
🥇 1 mistral-nemo mistralai 62/100 $0.0272 2275.2
🥈 2 ling-2.6-flash inclusionai 56/100 $0.0250 2240.0
🥉 3 l3-lunaris-8b sao10k 58/100 $0.0475 1221.1
4 mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501 mistralai 72/100 $0.0725 993.1
5 llama-3.1-8b-instruct meta-llama 62/100 $0.0725 855.2
6 deepseek-v4-flash deepseek 91/100 $0.1125 809.2
7 mythomax-l2-13b gryphe 48/100 $0.0600 800.0
8 gpt-oss-20b openai 78/100 $0.1050 742.9
9 gpt-oss-120b openai 93/100 $0.1350 688.9
10 laguna-xs-2.1 poolside 72/100 $0.1050 685.7

📈 Analysis

🏆 Best Value Today: mistral-nemo scores 2275.2 with a capability rating of 62 at $0.0272/M tokens.

💵 Cheapest Premium Model: ling-2.6-flash at $0.0250/M tokens (capability: 56).

What “Value Score” means: Capability score (based on SWE-bench, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench) divided by blended cost per million tokens (25% input + 75% output weights for coding workloads). Free tier models get a massive boost. Higher is better.

📋 All Scored Models (66 total)

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokValue
1mistral-nemomistralai62$0.02722275.2
2ling-2.6-flashinclusionai56$0.02502240.0
3l3-lunaris-8bsao10k58$0.04751221.1
4mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501mistralai72$0.0725993.1
5llama-3.1-8b-instructmeta-llama62$0.0725855.2
6deepseek-v4-flashdeepseek91$0.1125809.2
7mythomax-l2-13bgryphe48$0.0600800.0
8gpt-oss-20bopenai78$0.1050742.9
9gpt-oss-120bopenai93$0.1350688.9
10laguna-xs-2.1poolside72$0.1050685.7
11gemma-3-4b-itgoogle50$0.0875571.4
12granite-4.1-8bibm-granite48$0.0875548.6
13qwen3.5-9bqwen72$0.1375523.6
14qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507qwen82$0.1568522.9
15gemma-3-12b-itgoogle60$0.1250480.0
16command-r7b-12-2024cohere54$0.1219443.1
17granite-4.0-h-microibm-granite38$0.0882430.6
18ministral-3b-2512mistralai42$0.1000420.0
19nova-micro-v1amazon45$0.1137395.6
20qwen3-32bqwen88$0.2300382.6
21mistral-small-3.2-24b-instructmistralai78$0.2109369.8
22qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instructqwen84$0.2275369.2
23qwen-2.5-7b-instructqwen60$0.1750342.9
24qwen3.5-flash-02-23qwen70$0.2112331.4
25llama-3.3-70b-instructmeta-llama84$0.2650317.0
26gpt-oss-safeguard-20bopenai77$0.2437315.9
27nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3bnvidia50$0.1625307.7
28nova-lite-v1amazon58$0.1950297.4
29gemma-4-31b-itgoogle74$0.2800264.3
30gemma-4-26b-a4b-itgoogle72$0.2725264.2
31seed-1.6-flashbytedance-seed64$0.2437262.6
32gpt-5-nanoopenai82$0.3125262.4
33step-3.5-flashstepfun60$0.2500240.0
34nemotron-3-super-120b-a12bnvidia76$0.3212236.6
35seed-2.0-minibytedance-seed72$0.3250221.5
36qwen3-235b-a22b-2507qwen96$0.4350220.7
37llama-3.1-70b-instructmeta-llama82$0.4000205.0
38llama-3.2-1b-instructmeta-llama30$0.1575190.5
39glm-4.7-flashz-ai60$0.3150190.5
40gemma-3-27b-itgoogle68$0.3575190.2
41gpt-4.1-nanoopenai60$0.3250184.6
42llama-3.2-3b-instructmeta-llama48$0.2600184.6
43ring-2.6-1tinclusionai78$0.4875160.0
44gpt-4o-miniopenai74$0.4875151.8
45ling-2.6-1tinclusionai74$0.4875151.8
46hy3-previewtencent68$0.4950137.4
47command-r-08-2024cohere60$0.4875123.1
48deepseek-chatdeepseek90$0.8359107.7
49qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructqwen90$0.8500105.9
50qwen3-coderqwen85$0.8250103.0
51qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinkingqwen93$0.937599.2
52qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instructqwen86$0.915094.0
53hermes-3-llama-3.1-405bnousresearch78$1.0078.0
54claude-3-haikuanthropic72$1.0072.0
55dolphin-mistral-24b-venice-editioncognitivecomputations52$0.725071.7
56gpt-4.1-miniopenai76$1.3058.5
57deepseek-r1deepseek95$2.0546.3
58gemini-2.5-flashgoogle86$1.9544.1
59nova-pro-v1amazon70$2.6026.9
60gpt-4.1openai90$6.5013.8
61gpt-5openai97$7.8112.4
62gemini-2.5-progoogle94$7.8112.0
63gpt-4oopenai88$8.1310.8
64command-r-plus-08-2024cohere68$8.138.4
65claude-sonnet-4anthropic96$12.008.0
66claude-opus-4anthropic98$60.001.6

Generated 2026-08-17 02:00 UTC · Data from OpenRouter API and public benchmarks · Bang-for-Buck = Capability / Cost