Top AI Stories – July 11, 2026

Another busy day in artificial intelligence brings major developments across the industry. OpenAI released its latest frontier model series, Apple filed a bombshell trade-secret lawsuit against OpenAI, a solo developer got a 744-billion-parameter model running on a consumer laptop, Meta dropped aggressively priced Muse Spark 1.1, and OpenAI overhauled its desktop app with a new “Work” mode. Here are the top stories.

1. OpenAI Releases GPT-5.6 with Sol, Terra, and Luna Tiers

OpenAI launched GPT-5.6 on July 10, introducing a three-tier model lineup: Sol (frontier intelligence), Terra (mid-range), and Luna (efficient). The naming scheme replaces the previous generation and represents a significant leap in benchmark performance. GPT-5.6 Sol achieves a new state-of-the-art score of 7.8% on ARC-AGI-3, making it the first verified frontier model to beat an ARC-AGI-3 game. In a stunning development, the Sol Ultra variant produced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture — an open problem in graph theory — with the full prompt and PDF released by OpenAI.

OpenAI’s developer guide for the model highlights improved “intent understanding,” allowing GPT-5.6 to better infer the user’s underlying goals without requiring every step to be spelled out. The company also emphasized token efficiency, positioning the model as smarter per token rather than just bigger. The deployment safety PDF is available at deploymentsafety.openai.com, and the model is accessible via the OpenAI API and ChatGPT.

Early community testing has been mixed but largely positive. Independent evals show GPT-5.6 Sol performing strongly on complex agentic tasks, though some users note it feels comparable to GPT-5.5 in certain coding benchmarks. The ARC-AGI-3 result and the mathematics proof, however, mark clear milestones in AI reasoning capability.

2. Apple Sues OpenAI for Trade Secret Theft

Apple filed a lawsuit against OpenAI on July 10 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, accusing the company of orchestrating a systematic campaign of trade secret theft. The complaint names former Apple VP of Product Design Tang Tan and former senior system electrical engineer Chang Liu as defendants, alongside OpenAI and its hardware subsidiary io Products.

According to the filing, Tan used his knowledge of Apple’s confidential projects to grill job candidates and directed them to bring actual Apple hardware components and prototypes to interviews for “show and tell” sessions. One candidate reportedly commented he “didn’t even know we could take those from the office.” Liu, who left Apple in January 2026 after eight years, allegedly exploited a security bug to download confidential engineering files — including a “compilation of technical files with over a thousand pages” — after leaving the company, joking about it in messages (“LOL,” “so funny”).

Apple says it first raised concerns with OpenAI in February 2026, but OpenAI never responded. The suit also alleges that OpenAI used a trusted Apple supplier to carry out Apple’s proprietary metal-finishing technique by misleading the partner into believing it had Apple’s permission. Over 400 former Apple employees now work at OpenAI, according to the filing. OpenAI’s hardware efforts — led by former Apple design chief Jony Ive, whose startup io was acquired for $6.5 billion — include a rumored smartphone targeting 2028 and a HomePod-style smart speaker. The implications for enterprise trust in OpenAI are significant, with many in the tech community viewing the allegations as deeply damaging to OpenAI’s credibility.

3. Solo Developer Runs GLM 5.2 (744B MoE) on a Consumer Laptop

Developer “JustVugg” released Colibrì, a project that runs Zhipu AI’s GLM 5.2 — a 744-billion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model — on a consumer laptop with just 25 GB of RAM. The engine is written in pure C (~2,400 lines) with zero dependencies, no GPU required, and no Python at runtime.

The approach exploits GLM 5.2’s MoE architecture: only ~40 billion parameters activate per token, and only ~11 GB of those change from token to token (the routed experts). The dense part (~17B params) stays resident in RAM at int4 precision (~9.9 GB), while the 21,504 routed experts live on disk (~370 GB) and are streamed on demand with a per-layer LRU cache. The system achieves roughly 0.1 tokens per second on the developer’s hardware and includes features like Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA) with KV cache absorption, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) with rejection sampling, and crash-safe KV persistence.

The project has sparked significant discussion about local LLM inference techniques, with many commenters noting that similar approaches could make large MoE models practical on consumer hardware as SSD speeds and CPU parallelism continue to improve. Some are working on Mac-native implementations using Apple Silicon’s unified memory and Metal kernels.

4. Meta Releases Muse Spark 1.1 with Aggressive Pricing

Meta launched Muse Spark 1.1, the latest version of its general-purpose model API, with pricing that undercuts much of the competition: $1.25 per million input tokens, $4.50 per million output tokens, and just $0.15 for cached input. The model is available through the Meta developer platform at dev.meta.ai.

The release includes an evaluation report with Terminal-Bench 2.1 results, positioning the model as competitive with frontier offerings at a fraction of the cost. Simon Willison created a plugin for his LLM tool, demonstrating the model’s accessibility from the command line. The community response has been notable: commenters observe that Meta’s strategy of releasing capable models at near-cost pricing effectively “commoditizes” the AI model market, putting pressure on OpenAI and Anthropic to justify their premium pricing. As one HN commenter put it, Meta doesn’t need to match rival revenue — it only needs to “deflate theirs by 99%.”

5. OpenAI Launches “ChatGPT Work” — A Unified Desktop Experience

OpenAI rolled out ChatGPT Work, a major overhaul of its desktop application that merges the previously separate ChatGPT and Codex apps into a single interface with three modes: Chat, Work, and Code. The Work mode is designed for business and productivity tasks, with integrated Office plugins and agentic capabilities that can access files and run tools.

The move mirrors Anthropic’s recent “Chat vs. Cowork” interface split, and appears to be part of a broader industry shift toward unified agentic workspaces. However, the launch has drawn significant user criticism. Early adopters report confusion over the mode distinctions and frustration that the old chat-focused interface has been relegated to a “tiny, unsearchable popup window.” The renaming of the previous app to “ChatGPT Classic” suggests eventual deprecation, which has angered users who preferred the simpler interface. The product development appears to be moving fast to reconcile multiple product visions — chat, coding, and enterprise productivity — into a single platform.

Closing Thoughts

Today’s stories highlight an AI industry in rapid flux: OpenAI pushes the frontier with GPT-5.6 while facing legal headwinds, Meta commoditizes model access, a solo developer proves that local inference of massive models is possible, and the UX of AI tools continues to evolve — not always gracefully. The competitive landscape is as dynamic as ever, with breakthroughs, legal battles, and community-driven innovation all shaping the week’s narrative.

☁️ AI Weather Report — Top 10 Models for Coding Value — July 11, 2026

Welcome to the AI Weather Report for July 11, 2026. This daily report ranks the top 10 AI models for coding by bang for the buck — a combination of raw coding capability and API pricing.

📊 Today’s Top 10 Rankings

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokensValue Score
🥇 1 hy3:free tencent 68/100 $0.0000 6800.0
🥈 2 llama-3.1-8b-instruct meta-llama 62/100 $0.0275 2254.5
🥉 3 mistral-nemo mistralai 62/100 $0.0275 2254.5
4 ling-2.6-flash inclusionai 56/100 $0.0250 2240.0
5 l3-lunaris-8b sao10k 58/100 $0.0475 1221.1
6 mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501 mistralai 72/100 $0.0725 993.1
7 qwen3-235b-a22b-2507 qwen 96/100 $0.0975 984.6
8 mythomax-l2-13b gryphe 48/100 $0.0600 800.0
9 qwen-2.5-7b-instruct qwen 60/100 $0.0850 705.9
10 gpt-oss-20b openai 78/100 $0.1123 694.9

📈 Analysis

🏆 Best Value Today: hy3:free scores 6800.0 with a capability rating of 68 at $0.0000/M tokens.

💵 Cheapest Premium Model: ling-2.6-flash at $0.0250/M tokens (capability: 56).

What “Value Score” means: Capability score (based on SWE-bench, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench) divided by blended cost per million tokens (25% input + 75% output weights for coding workloads). Free tier models get a massive boost. Higher is better.

📋 All Scored Models (68 total)

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokValue
1hy3:freetencent68$0.00006800.0
2llama-3.1-8b-instructmeta-llama62$0.02752254.5
3mistral-nemomistralai62$0.02752254.5
4ling-2.6-flashinclusionai56$0.02502240.0
5l3-lunaris-8bsao10k58$0.04751221.1
6mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501mistralai72$0.0725993.1
7qwen3-235b-a22b-2507qwen96$0.0975984.6
8mythomax-l2-13bgryphe48$0.0600800.0
9qwen-2.5-7b-instructqwen60$0.0850705.9
10gpt-oss-20bopenai78$0.1123694.9
11laguna-xs-2.1poolside72$0.1050685.7
12gpt-oss-120bopenai93$0.1440645.8
13deepseek-v4-flashdeepseek91$0.1470619.0
14gemma-3-4b-itgoogle50$0.0875571.4
15granite-4.1-8bibm-granite48$0.0875548.6
16qwen3.5-9bqwen72$0.1375523.6
17qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507qwen82$0.1568522.9
18gemma-3-27b-itgoogle68$0.1400485.7
19gemma-3-12b-itgoogle60$0.1250480.0
20mistral-small-3.2-24b-instructmistralai78$0.1688462.2
21command-r7b-12-2024cohere54$0.1219443.1
22granite-4.0-h-microibm-granite38$0.0882430.6
23ministral-3b-2512mistralai42$0.1000420.0
24nova-micro-v1amazon45$0.1137395.6
25hy3-previewtencent68$0.1732392.5
26qwen3-32bqwen88$0.2300382.6
27qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instructqwen84$0.2200381.8
28qwen3.5-flash-02-23qwen70$0.2112331.4
29llama-3.3-70b-instructmeta-llama84$0.2650317.0
30gpt-oss-safeguard-20bopenai77$0.2437315.9
31nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3bnvidia50$0.1625307.7
32nova-lite-v1amazon58$0.1950297.4
33gemma-4-26b-a4b-itgoogle72$0.2625274.3
34seed-1.6-flashbytedance-seed64$0.2437262.6
35gpt-5-nanoopenai82$0.3125262.4
36gemma-4-31b-itgoogle74$0.2925253.0
37step-3.5-flashstepfun60$0.2500240.0
38laguna-m.1poolside80$0.3500228.6
39seed-2.0-minibytedance-seed72$0.3250221.5
40nemotron-3-super-120b-a12bnvidia76$0.3575212.6
41llama-3.1-70b-instructmeta-llama82$0.4000205.0
42llama-3.2-1b-instructmeta-llama30$0.1575190.5
43glm-4.7-flashz-ai60$0.3150190.5
44gpt-4.1-nanoopenai60$0.3250184.6
45llama-3.2-3b-instructmeta-llama48$0.2600184.6
46ring-2.6-1tinclusionai78$0.4875160.0
47qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinkingqwen93$0.6094152.6
48gpt-4o-miniopenai74$0.4875151.8
49ling-2.6-1tinclusionai74$0.4875151.8
50deepseek-chatdeepseek90$0.6501138.4
51command-r-08-2024cohere60$0.4875123.1
52qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructqwen90$0.8475106.2
53qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instructqwen86$0.915094.0
54hermes-3-llama-3.1-405bnousresearch78$1.0078.0
55claude-3-haikuanthropic72$1.0072.0
56dolphin-mistral-24b-venice-editioncognitivecomputations52$0.725071.7
57qwen3-coderqwen85$1.4160.5
58gpt-4.1-miniopenai76$1.3058.5
59deepseek-r1deepseek95$2.0546.3
60gemini-2.5-flashgoogle86$1.9544.1
61nova-pro-v1amazon70$2.6026.9
62gpt-4.1openai90$6.5013.8
63gpt-5openai97$7.8112.4
64gemini-2.5-progoogle94$7.8112.0
65gpt-4oopenai88$8.1310.8
66command-r-plus-08-2024cohere68$8.138.4
67claude-sonnet-4anthropic96$12.008.0
68claude-opus-4anthropic98$60.001.6

Generated 2026-07-11 02:00 UTC · Data from OpenRouter API and public benchmarks · Bang-for-Buck = Capability / Cost

Top AI Stories – July 10, 2026

Another packed day in artificial intelligence. OpenAI dropped two major announcements — the GPT-5.6 family and GPT-Live voice — while xAI and Cursor shipped Grok 4.5, a highly economical frontier model. On the open-source side, a solo developer got the massive 744-billion-parameter GLM 5.2 running on a humble laptop. And in tech policy, the FTC secured a landmark right-to-repair settlement with John Deere. Here are the top stories.

FTC Secures Right-to-Repair Settlement with John Deere

The Federal Trade Commission, joined by attorneys general from Arizona, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, secured a right-to-repair settlement Wednesday with agriculture equipment giant Deere & Co. The settlement requires John Deere to provide farmers and independent repair shops with the diagnostic software and repair tools necessary to service their own equipment — access the company had long restricted to its authorized dealer network.

The antitrust lawsuit, filed in January 2025, argued that Deere had illegally monopolized the repair market for tractors, forestry equipment, and construction machinery by withholding its proprietary service software tool from independent mechanics. Under the settlement, Deere dealers are also prohibited from retaliating against customers who choose independent repair over authorized service. The company must pay $1 million collectively to the five states for antitrust enforcement costs and will operate under strict compliance oversight for the next ten years.

“For too long, Arizona farmers and independent mechanics have been at the mercy of Deere’s monopoly over repair tools, forced to wait — and pay — for authorized dealers just to fix broken tractors and other equipment,” said Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes in a statement.

The settlement follows a separate $99 million class-action settlement Deere reached with farmers in April. Deere Vice President Denver Caldwell welcomed the agreement, saying, “This is good news for our customers and for the future of how Deere equipment is supported.” The case represents a significant escalation in the broader right-to-repair movement, which has gained momentum across the tech and agriculture sectors in recent years.

OpenAI Unveils GPT-5.6 Family: Sol, Terra, and Luna

OpenAI released GPT-5.6, a new model family comprising three variants under a fresh naming scheme: Sol for flagship frontier capability, Terra for balanced performance and cost, and Luna for efficient high-volume workloads. The gpt-5.6 API alias routes to Sol by default.

GPT-5.6 Sol achieves a new state-of-the-art score of 7.8% on ARC-AGI-3, making it the first verified frontier model to beat an ARC-AGI-3 game benchmark. OpenAI also published a safety system card documenting the model’s capabilities and deployment safeguards. According to OpenAI’s developer documentation, the model features improved “intent understanding” — better inferring a user’s underlying goal without requiring every step to be spelled out — and delivers significant gains in token efficiency across complex production workflows.

Notable benchmark comparisons suggest GPT-5.6 Sol leads against Anthropic’s Fable across multiple evaluations, though the gap varies by task. The model also shows marked improvement in frontend aesthetics, including layout, visual hierarchy, and design judgment. Pricing for the GPT-5.5/5.6 tier is reported at $5/M input tokens and $30/M output tokens, placing it at the premium end of the frontier model market.

OpenAI also recommends tuning the reasoning.effort parameter explicitly when migrating from GPT-5.5, as GPT-5.6’s improved efficiency may allow using a lower reasoning setting for equivalent or better results.

xAI and Cursor Ship Grok 4.5: Fast, Cheap, and Trained on Real-World Code

xAI, in collaboration with Cursor, released Grok 4.5 — a new frontier model that stands out for its remarkable efficiency. Priced at just $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens (with a fast variant at $4/$18), Grok 4.5 undercuts competitors by a wide margin: GPT-5.4 costs $2.5/$15, GPT-5.5/5.6 run $5/$30, and Anthropic’s Opus 4.8 and Fable are priced at $5/$25 and $10/$50 respectively.

What makes Grok 4.5 particularly interesting is its training data. The model was trained on “trillions of tokens of Cursor data” — real-world developer interactions with codebases and software tools — giving it an unusually grounded understanding of how developers actually work. Unlike Cursor’s previous Composer 2.5, which was a coding specialist, Grok 4.5’s training mix was deliberately broadened to include high-quality STEM tasks, research papers, and knowledge work spanning software engineering, data science, finance, and legal domains.

The model was refined using reinforcement learning on difficult problems in realistic environments, teaching it to investigate problems, use tools, recover from mistakes, and verify results. Cursor developed a distributed agent system to construct these training environments at scale — some of which would have taken “teams of hundreds of engineers months to build.”

Early benchmarks place Grok 4.5 around the Opus 4.7 level with roughly 4x better reasoning efficiency per dollar. HN users report inference speeds around 90 tokens per second — easily outpacing GPT-5.5, Opus 4.8, and GLM 5.2 — while delivering strong results on real-world coding tasks including native iOS app development. Grok 4.5 is available immediately in Cursor across desktop, web, iOS, CLI, and SDK, with double usage allocations for the first week.

GPT-Live: Real-Time Voice AI with Full-Duplex Conversation

OpenAI also introduced GPT-Live, a new real-time voice model built on a full-duplex architecture — meaning it can speak and listen simultaneously, like a natural human conversation. The model can also delegate complex queries to GPT-5.5 in the background, ensuring users aren’t limited to a voice model that lags behind the text frontier.

In a demonstration video, the model handled real-time language translation and natural banter with elderly users, positioning it as a potential companion and assistant for everyday conversation. OpenAI’s Atty Uttamre confirmed on HN that GPT-Live-1 is “the first version of a new generation of models” and that the full-duplex architecture “enables entirely new ways of human-AI interaction.”

Preview users report mixed reactions. One HN user described a one-hour uninterrupted brainstorming session while walking the dog, praising the ability to stay in voice mode throughout. Another noted that the model sometimes interrupts too eagerly or laughs at unintended jokes. Community feedback also highlighted a significant gap: none of the frontier assistants — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Grok — currently support tools or connectors while in voice mode, limiting productive use cases like researching, pulling up documents, or jotting notes mid-conversation.

Despite these rough edges, GPT-Live represents a meaningful step toward more natural human-AI interaction, and multiple commenters noted its potential as a life-changing accessibility tool for blind users once video capabilities and smart glasses integration arrive.

One Developer’s Quest: Running GLM 5.2 (744B Parameters) on a 32GB Laptop

In a remarkable feat of software engineering, a solo developer — going by the handle “vforno” — managed to run GLM 5.2, Zhipu AI’s massive 744-billion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model, on a 12-core laptop with just 25 GB of usable RAM. The project, called Colibrì, is a minimalist C inference engine (roughly 1,300 lines) that makes novel use of disk streaming to sidestep memory constraints.

GLM 5.2 activates only about 40 billion parameters per token thanks to its MoE architecture. Colibrì keeps the dense portion — attention, shared experts, and embeddings (~17B parameters) — resident in RAM at int4 precision (~9.9 GB). The 21,504 routed experts (~370 GB total) live on disk and are streamed on demand via a per-layer LRU cache, an optional pinned hot-store, and the OS page cache as a free second-level cache. The result: about 0.1 tokens per second on the slowest hardware, but it works.

“The important thing was the journey to reach this goal,” the developer wrote. “I just wanted it to work at all costs, even slowly.” The project has sparked a lively HN discussion about disk-streaming inference, with multiple developers sharing similar approaches for other large models. One commenter is working on a Metal-backed macOS variant targeting Apple Silicon’s unified memory, while others noted that llama.cpp already supports mmap-based model loading for similar purposes, though Colibrì’s advantage is its extreme portability and minimal dependencies — no BLAS, no Python at runtime, and no GPU required.

It is a striking demonstration of how far open-source inference has come: a model that would have required a server cluster just two years ago can now be coaxed into running on consumer hardware, albeit slowly. The full project is available on GitHub.

Closing Thoughts

Today’s headlines capture an industry moving on multiple fronts simultaneously. OpenAI is pushing on both the pure intelligence frontier (GPT-5.6) and the interaction frontier (GPT-Live). xAI and Cursor are proving that specialized, efficiently trained models can compete with — and in some dimensions outperform — the big incumbents at a fraction of the cost. And the open-source community continues to democratize access, finding clever ways to run billion-parameter models on hardware that would have been laughed at just a few years ago. Meanwhile, regulators are increasingly holding tech giants accountable for how their software locks in consumers. It was a busy day in AI.

☁️ AI Weather Report — Top 10 Models for Coding Value — July 10, 2026

Welcome to the AI Weather Report for July 10, 2026. This daily report ranks the top 10 AI models for coding by bang for the buck — a combination of raw coding capability and API pricing.

📊 Today’s Top 10 Rankings

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokensValue Score
🥇 1 hy3:free tencent 68/100 $0.0000 6800.0
🥈 2 llama-3.1-8b-instruct meta-llama 62/100 $0.0275 2254.5
🥉 3 mistral-nemo mistralai 62/100 $0.0275 2254.5
4 ling-2.6-flash inclusionai 56/100 $0.0250 2240.0
5 l3-lunaris-8b sao10k 58/100 $0.0475 1221.1
6 mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501 mistralai 72/100 $0.0725 993.1
7 qwen3-235b-a22b-2507 qwen 96/100 $0.0975 984.6
8 mythomax-l2-13b gryphe 48/100 $0.0600 800.0
9 qwen-2.5-7b-instruct qwen 60/100 $0.0850 705.9
10 gpt-oss-20b openai 78/100 $0.1123 694.9

📈 Analysis

🏆 Best Value Today: hy3:free scores 6800.0 with a capability rating of 68 at $0.0000/M tokens.

💵 Cheapest Premium Model: ling-2.6-flash at $0.0250/M tokens (capability: 56).

What “Value Score” means: Capability score (based on SWE-bench, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench) divided by blended cost per million tokens (25% input + 75% output weights for coding workloads). Free tier models get a massive boost. Higher is better.

📋 All Scored Models (69 total)

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokValue
1hy3:freetencent68$0.00006800.0
2llama-3.1-8b-instructmeta-llama62$0.02752254.5
3mistral-nemomistralai62$0.02752254.5
4ling-2.6-flashinclusionai56$0.02502240.0
5l3-lunaris-8bsao10k58$0.04751221.1
6mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501mistralai72$0.0725993.1
7qwen3-235b-a22b-2507qwen96$0.0975984.6
8mythomax-l2-13bgryphe48$0.0600800.0
9qwen-2.5-7b-instructqwen60$0.0850705.9
10gpt-oss-20bopenai78$0.1123694.9
11laguna-xs-2.1poolside72$0.1050685.7
12gpt-oss-120bopenai93$0.1440645.8
13deepseek-v4-flashdeepseek91$0.1575577.8
14gemma-3-4b-itgoogle50$0.0875571.4
15granite-4.1-8bibm-granite48$0.0875548.6
16qwen3.5-9bqwen72$0.1375523.6
17qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507qwen82$0.1568522.9
18gemma-3-27b-itgoogle68$0.1400485.7
19gemma-3-12b-itgoogle60$0.1250480.0
20mistral-small-3.2-24b-instructmistralai78$0.1688462.2
21command-r7b-12-2024cohere54$0.1219443.1
22granite-4.0-h-microibm-granite38$0.0882430.6
23trinity-miniarcee-ai52$0.1238420.2
24ministral-3b-2512mistralai42$0.1000420.0
25nova-micro-v1amazon45$0.1137395.6
26hy3-previewtencent68$0.1732392.5
27qwen3-32bqwen88$0.2300382.6
28qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instructqwen84$0.2200381.8
29qwen3.5-flash-02-23qwen70$0.2112331.4
30llama-3.3-70b-instructmeta-llama84$0.2650317.0
31gpt-oss-safeguard-20bopenai77$0.2437315.9
32nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3bnvidia50$0.1625307.7
33nova-lite-v1amazon58$0.1950297.4
34gemma-4-26b-a4b-itgoogle72$0.2625274.3
35seed-1.6-flashbytedance-seed64$0.2437262.6
36gpt-5-nanoopenai82$0.3125262.4
37gemma-4-31b-itgoogle74$0.2925253.0
38step-3.5-flashstepfun60$0.2500240.0
39laguna-m.1poolside80$0.3500228.6
40seed-2.0-minibytedance-seed72$0.3250221.5
41nemotron-3-super-120b-a12bnvidia76$0.3575212.6
42llama-3.1-70b-instructmeta-llama82$0.4000205.0
43llama-3.2-1b-instructmeta-llama30$0.1575190.5
44glm-4.7-flashz-ai60$0.3150190.5
45gpt-4.1-nanoopenai60$0.3250184.6
46llama-3.2-3b-instructmeta-llama48$0.2600184.6
47ring-2.6-1tinclusionai78$0.4875160.0
48qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinkingqwen93$0.6094152.6
49gpt-4o-miniopenai74$0.4875151.8
50ling-2.6-1tinclusionai74$0.4875151.8
51deepseek-chatdeepseek90$0.6501138.4
52command-r-08-2024cohere60$0.4875123.1
53qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructqwen90$0.8475106.2
54qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instructqwen86$0.915094.0
55hermes-3-llama-3.1-405bnousresearch78$1.0078.0
56claude-3-haikuanthropic72$1.0072.0
57dolphin-mistral-24b-venice-editioncognitivecomputations52$0.725071.7
58qwen3-coderqwen85$1.4160.5
59gpt-4.1-miniopenai76$1.3058.5
60deepseek-r1deepseek95$2.0546.3
61gemini-2.5-flashgoogle86$1.9544.1
62nova-pro-v1amazon70$2.6026.9
63gpt-4.1openai90$6.5013.8
64gpt-5openai97$7.8112.4
65gemini-2.5-progoogle94$7.8112.0
66gpt-4oopenai88$8.1310.8
67command-r-plus-08-2024cohere68$8.138.4
68claude-sonnet-4anthropic96$12.008.0
69claude-opus-4anthropic98$60.001.6

Generated 2026-07-10 02:00 UTC · Data from OpenRouter API and public benchmarks · Bang-for-Buck = Capability / Cost

☁️ AI Weather Report — Top 10 Models for Coding Value — July 09, 2026

Welcome to the AI Weather Report for July 09, 2026. This daily report ranks the top 10 AI models for coding by bang for the buck — a combination of raw coding capability and API pricing.

📊 Today’s Top 10 Rankings

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokensValue Score
🥇 1 hy3:free tencent 68/100 $0.0000 6800.0
🥈 2 llama-3.1-8b-instruct meta-llama 62/100 $0.0275 2254.5
🥉 3 mistral-nemo mistralai 62/100 $0.0275 2254.5
4 ling-2.6-flash inclusionai 56/100 $0.0250 2240.0
5 l3-lunaris-8b sao10k 58/100 $0.0475 1221.1
6 mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501 mistralai 72/100 $0.0725 993.1
7 qwen3-235b-a22b-2507 qwen 96/100 $0.0975 984.6
8 mythomax-l2-13b gryphe 48/100 $0.0600 800.0
9 qwen-2.5-7b-instruct qwen 60/100 $0.0850 705.9
10 gpt-oss-20b openai 78/100 $0.1123 694.9

📈 Analysis

🏆 Best Value Today: hy3:free scores 6800.0 with a capability rating of 68 at $0.0000/M tokens.

💵 Cheapest Premium Model: ling-2.6-flash at $0.0250/M tokens (capability: 56).

What “Value Score” means: Capability score (based on SWE-bench, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench) divided by blended cost per million tokens (25% input + 75% output weights for coding workloads). Free tier models get a massive boost. Higher is better.

📋 All Scored Models (68 total)

#ModelProviderCapabilityCost /M tokValue
1hy3:freetencent68$0.00006800.0
2llama-3.1-8b-instructmeta-llama62$0.02752254.5
3mistral-nemomistralai62$0.02752254.5
4ling-2.6-flashinclusionai56$0.02502240.0
5l3-lunaris-8bsao10k58$0.04751221.1
6mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501mistralai72$0.0725993.1
7qwen3-235b-a22b-2507qwen96$0.0975984.6
8mythomax-l2-13bgryphe48$0.0600800.0
9qwen-2.5-7b-instructqwen60$0.0850705.9
10gpt-oss-20bopenai78$0.1123694.9
11laguna-xs-2.1poolside72$0.1050685.7
12gpt-oss-120bopenai93$0.1440645.8
13deepseek-v4-flashdeepseek91$0.1575577.8
14gemma-3-4b-itgoogle50$0.0875571.4
15granite-4.1-8bibm-granite48$0.0875548.6
16qwen3.5-9bqwen72$0.1375523.6
17qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507qwen82$0.1568522.9
18gemma-3-27b-itgoogle68$0.1400485.7
19gemma-3-12b-itgoogle60$0.1250480.0
20mistral-small-3.2-24b-instructmistralai78$0.1688462.2
21command-r7b-12-2024cohere54$0.1219443.1
22granite-4.0-h-microibm-granite38$0.0882430.6
23trinity-miniarcee-ai52$0.1238420.2
24ministral-3b-2512mistralai42$0.1000420.0
25nova-micro-v1amazon45$0.1137395.6
26hy3-previewtencent68$0.1732392.5
27qwen3-32bqwen88$0.2300382.6
28qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instructqwen84$0.2200381.8
29qwen3.5-flash-02-23qwen70$0.2112331.4
30llama-3.3-70b-instructmeta-llama84$0.2650317.0
31gpt-oss-safeguard-20bopenai77$0.2437315.9
32nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3bnvidia50$0.1625307.7
33nova-lite-v1amazon58$0.1950297.4
34gemma-4-26b-a4b-itgoogle72$0.2625274.3
35seed-1.6-flashbytedance-seed64$0.2437262.6
36gpt-5-nanoopenai82$0.3125262.4
37gemma-4-31b-itgoogle74$0.2925253.0
38step-3.5-flashstepfun60$0.2500240.0
39laguna-m.1poolside80$0.3500228.6
40seed-2.0-minibytedance-seed72$0.3250221.5
41nemotron-3-super-120b-a12bnvidia76$0.3575212.6
42llama-3.1-70b-instructmeta-llama82$0.4000205.0
43llama-3.2-1b-instructmeta-llama30$0.1575190.5
44glm-4.7-flashz-ai60$0.3150190.5
45gpt-4.1-nanoopenai60$0.3250184.6
46llama-3.2-3b-instructmeta-llama48$0.2600184.6
47ring-2.6-1tinclusionai78$0.4875160.0
48qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinkingqwen93$0.6094152.6
49gpt-4o-miniopenai74$0.4875151.8
50ling-2.6-1tinclusionai74$0.4875151.8
51deepseek-chatdeepseek90$0.6501138.4
52command-r-08-2024cohere60$0.4875123.1
53qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructqwen90$0.8475106.2
54qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instructqwen86$0.915094.0
55hermes-3-llama-3.1-405bnousresearch78$1.0078.0
56claude-3-haikuanthropic72$1.0072.0
57qwen3-coderqwen85$1.4160.5
58gpt-4.1-miniopenai76$1.3058.5
59deepseek-r1deepseek95$2.0546.3
60gemini-2.5-flashgoogle86$1.9544.1
61nova-pro-v1amazon70$2.6026.9
62gpt-4.1openai90$6.5013.8
63gpt-5openai97$7.8112.4
64gemini-2.5-progoogle94$7.8112.0
65gpt-4oopenai88$8.1310.8
66command-r-plus-08-2024cohere68$8.138.4
67claude-sonnet-4anthropic96$12.008.0
68claude-opus-4anthropic98$60.001.6

Generated 2026-07-09 17:32 UTC · Data from OpenRouter API and public benchmarks · Bang-for-Buck = Capability / Cost